OCT15 Entrance slip
1) What are your "student bird"
and "teacher bird" thoughts about assigning percentages or letter
grades in the assessment of student work? What do the grades indicate? How are
they arrived at? Whose purposes do they serve? What are positive and negative
aspects to giving grades? to be assigned grades by an instructor?
I think assigning percentages or letter
grades are just a measure of how the students grasp the essential knowledge
(about a math concept, or about how to solve a problem). It is more straightforward
for math courses than other courses such as English, because when you can solve
a problem correctly, you certainly do have an understanding of the
concept/problem type. Grades indicate the level of understanding. They also
indicate how quickly one can solve the problems, for the tests usually have
time limits. They serve as a sign of achievement, at least partly, if not accurately.
They serve as a sign of competition, for sure. Students compare their own test results
with others to make sure that they are excelling at school. Positive aspects are
that they are warning signs for students who are “falling behind” in the learning
process, so that they would try harder. (as indicated in the article, "Grading
allows me to compare my marks with others; if I'm not doing as well as others,
I seem to try harder!") Negative aspects include unnecessary harm of
self-confidence, inaccurate representation of the real abilities, and excessive
stress for the students. Negative aspects of being assigned grades by an instructor
would be that students lose the autonomy and intrinsic motivation to study.
2) What are some of the unintended side
effects of grading? How do grades and marks in themselves format the social
relations and learning situations in a classroom, a school, a district?
“Some students compete against each other,
flaunting superior test scores over their friends. Others are embarrassed by
their grades, trying to hide their scores or feigning indifference by parading
their poor marks.”
This situation is pretty common in high
school if the scores are made public, or even when they are not made public. Students
will still compare with each other and this might create some side effects
regarding social relationships and self-confidence.
“When students are graded, they are constantly reminded to think about the rewards or punishments they will receive for an assignment or test. Therefore, their motivation to learn decreases (Kohn, 1998). “
When given reward/ extrinsic motivation, students
tend to focus on the reward instead of the actual learning task. However, I
think this is also questionable because if they are not even given rewards /
punishment, they might not just enjoy the task as the author stated. They would
likely disregard the task. So there has to be a carefully kept balance between
the two situations. As the author also stated, “some forms of external rewards
actually support students' motivation to learn. Ryan and Deci (2000) argue that
if those external rewards are used to control students and diminish autonomy,
then they decrease intrinsic motivation.” Hence, we should be careful about
which type of extrinsic motivation we use.
Also, “students are externally controlled
by grades and this will hinder their growth as self-directed, autonomous
learners”. Students stress out when thinking about the grades. This may not be
a good thing for their interest of studying.
3) Could you imagine teaching math and/or
science without giving grades? How could a teacher encourage learning without
having an emphasis on grading?
You can teach without emphasis on grading
but you can’t teach without giving grades... I mean, you could do it if you don’t
want to get into the university. However, nowadays students have the stress of getting
into the university so they kind of have to learn how to take tests. That is
part of the skills too. A teacher can encourage learning by teaching relational
understanding of concepts and asking the students to experiment with and discuss
about the solutions in a group setting. They could have their own choice of
topics for the week. but eventually the teacher has to teach all of the
contents for the course. So maybe they could choose to do the activities they
want to do, for instance, making up their own projects about a certain math topic
and then talk about it together in class. This might provide some intrinsic
motivation.
I like the idea of doing some project-based worked in math class and of teaching without emphasis on grading. Do you think the universities could work out their own entrance criteria, not based on high school testing?
回复删除That is a great idea! yes, I think they could do that if they want to. But in what form I don't know....
删除